Ciambetti

Ciambetti v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

Good Law
161 Cal. App. 2d 340·1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1739·326 P.2d 535
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 1958Civ. 9256California2,145 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peek, J.

This appeal arises out of an accusation containing two counts filed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, hereinafter referred to as the department. In Count I plaintiff was charged with having refilled two one-quart bottles of whiskey. Count II charged that plaintiff for some time has not been the sole owner of the business operated by her, but that her husband, James Ciambetti, is a part owner thereof in violation of sections 23300, 23355, 23951, 24040 and 24200, subdivision (e), of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.

A hearing officer before whom the matter was heard found both charges to be true and recommended the license be suspended for 30 days on Count I and that it be suspended indefinitely on Count II. The department adopted the recommendations of the hearing officer and plaintiff then appealed to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board. The board affirmed the action of the department and thereafter plaintiff filed her petition for a writ of mandate in the superior court. That court enjoined the suspension on Count II and this appeal followed.

The charge contained in Count I, being admitted, we have therefore limited our examination of the record solely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.