Hilton

Hilton v. Hallmark Cards

Good Law
580 F.3d 874·2009 WL 2710225·74 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 468·92 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1178·2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19571
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 200908-55443California7,748 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We must decide whether California law allows a celebrity to sue a greeting card company for using her image and catchphrase in a birthday card without her permission.

I

Paris Hilton is a controversial celebrity known for her lifestyle as a flamboyant heiress. As the saying goes, she is “famous for being famous.”

She is also famous for starring in “The Simple Life,” a so-called reality television program. The show places her and fellow heiress Nicole Ritchie in situations for which, the audience is to assume, their privileged upbringings have not prepared them. For example, work. In an episode called “Sonic Burger Shenanigans,” Hilton is employed as a waitress in a “fast food joint.” As in most episodes, Hilton says, “that’s hot,” whenever she finds something interesting or amusing. She has registered the phrase as a trademark with the United States Patent & Trademark Office.

Hallmark Cards is a major national purveyor of greeting cards for various occasions. This case is about one of its birthday cards. The front cover of the card contains a picture above a caption that reads, “Paris’s First Day as a Waitress.” The picture depicts a cartoon waitress, complete with apron,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.