Inzunza

United States v. Inzunza

Good Law
580 F.3d 894·2009 WL 2750488·2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20825
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 200905-50902, 05-50960California9,771 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

Ralph Inzunza and Michael Zucchet, former members of the San Diego City Council, were indicted on numerous counts of honest services fraud, conspiracy to commit honest services fraud, and extortion. Both cases went to trial, and both defendants were convicted on various counts. The district court rejected Inzunza’s motion for acquittal and a new trial. It granted Zucchet’s motion for acquittal on several counts and his motion for a new trial on the remaining two. Inzunza has appealed his convictions, and the government has appealed the district court’s rulings on Zucchet’s motions. We affirm the holdings of the district court with respect to both Inzunza and Zucchet. We stay our mandate, however, to await the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Weyhrauch, 548 F.3d 1237 (9th Cir.2008), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2863 , 174 L.Ed.2d 575 , 2009 WL 789239 (U.S. June 29, 2009).

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In 2000, the San Diego City Council enacted an ordinance banning touching between exotic dancers and patrons: the so-called No-Touch ordinance. This ordinance replaced another provision banning only “lewd and lascivious” conduct at clubs. The bright line aspect of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.