Langert

State Bar v. Langert

Good Law
1954 Cal. LEXIS 283·43 Cal. 2d 636·276 P.2d 596
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 16, 1954S. F. 18981California2,603 words

Opinion

Opinion

Edmonds, J.

This original proceeding was brought by The State Bar to revoke an order admitting Eli David Langert to practice as an attorney at law. The petition alleges that Langert, with intent to conceal from the Committee of Bar Examiners certain material facts relating to his moral qualifications, knowingly falsified in answering certain questions bearing upon his eligibility to become a member of the bar of this state.

More specifically, The State Bar pleads the following facts: In 1944, in his verified application to take the bar examination, Langert stated that he had never previously been examined for admission to practice law except in this state in 1943; that he had never held a license, the procurement of which required proof of good character; that he had never been reprimanded, censured or otherwise disciplined as an attorney or member of any profession or organization and that no charges had ever been made or filed or proceedings instituted against him. Other answers made by him were that his various addresses from 1927 to 1938 were Chicago, Illinois; Peoria, Illinois; and Henry, Illinois. During the same period, he said, he had worked in several capacities, none of which was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.