Russell

Coburg Oil Co. v. Russell

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 2d 214·1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1585·276 P.2d 637
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 1954Civ. 17718California758 words

Opinion

Opinion

Shinn, J.

Guy N. Stafford has moved the court to recall and correct the remittitur issued out of this court in Coburg Oil Co. v. Russell; Guy N. Stafford, defendant and appellant, Civil No. 17718, reported in 100 Cal.App.2d 200 [ 223 P.2d 305 ]. The transactions out of which the present action arose have been the subject of extended litigation, phases of which were considered on appeal in Stafford v. Russell, 117 Cal.App.2d 319 [ 255 P.2d 872 ], and Sanders v. Howard Park Co., 86 Cal.App.2d 721 [ 195 P.2d 898 ].

In Coburg, this court affirmed an order striking out an answer and a cross-complaint of Guy N. Stafford in an action instituted by Coburg. The following material facts were before the court on that appeal and are for consideration on the present motion: Coburg (formerly Petroleum Development Company) brought an action, the ultimate purpose of which was to establish that it was the owner of a valid oil lease executed in 1924 covering certain lots in a tract known as Athens in Los Angeles County. Stafford, as owner of five of the lots in question, was named as a defendant. He filed an answer and a cross-complaint. By stipulation the answer was withdrawn, the cross-complaint was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.