Russell
Coburg Oil Co. v. Russell
Opinion
Opinion
Shinn, J.
Guy N. Stafford has moved the court to recall and correct the remittitur issued out of this court in Coburg Oil Co. v. Russell; Guy N. Stafford, defendant and appellant, Civil No. 17718, reported in 100 Cal.App.2d 200 [ 223 P.2d 305 ]. The transactions out of which the present action arose have been the subject of extended litigation, phases of which were considered on appeal in Stafford v. Russell, 117 Cal.App.2d 319 [ 255 P.2d 872 ], and Sanders v. Howard Park Co., 86 Cal.App.2d 721 [ 195 P.2d 898 ].
In Coburg, this court affirmed an order striking out an answer and a cross-complaint of Guy N. Stafford in an action instituted by Coburg. The following material facts were before the court on that appeal and are for consideration on the present motion: Coburg (formerly Petroleum Development Company) brought an action, the ultimate purpose of which was to establish that it was the owner of a valid oil lease executed in 1924 covering certain lots in a tract known as Athens in Los Angeles County. Stafford, as owner of five of the lots in question, was named as a defendant. He filed an answer and a cross-complaint. By stipulation the answer was withdrawn, the cross-complaint was…