Stuart

Stuart v. State Bar

Good Law
1985 Cal. LEXIS 437·221 Cal. Rptr. 557·40 Cal. 3d 838·710 P.2d 357
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 31, 1985L.A. 32075California2,612 words

Opinion

Opinion

This is a proceedihg to review a recommendation of the State Bar that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for one year, and that execution be stayed on certain conditions including a one-year probation period and passage of the Professional Responsibility Examination.

Petitioner was admitted to the practice of law in 1973. In 1977, he was privately reproved for encouraging a third party to cash two checks that petitioner drew but later failed to honor.

The present disciplinary proceedings arise out of petitioner’s representation of Angel Guzman in a personal injury suit. The hearing panel of the State Bar Court found that petitioner willfully failed to (1) communicate with the client to secure answers to defense interrogatories; (2) inform the client of the consequences of not filing timely responses to such interrogatories; (3) communicate with defense counsel or the court to obtain an extension of time to respond to the interrogatories; (4) inform the client that the defendants had filed a motion to compel answers to the interrogatories; (5) file any response to the defendants’ motion to compel or appear at the hearing on the motion; (6) inform the client…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.