Maine v. Superior Court

Bad Law
1968 Cal. LEXIS 170·66 Cal. Rptr. 724·68 Cal. 2d 375·438 P.2d 372
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 18, 1968S. F. 22588; S. F. 22589California5,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

Petitioners, Leonard E. Maine and Thomas E. Braun, seek writs of mandate directed to the Superior Court of the County of Mendocino. By grand jury indictment they are each accused of murder (Pen. Code, § 187), two counts of kidnaping (Pen. Code, §207), forcible rape (Pen. Code, §261, subd. 4) and assault with intent to commit murder (Pen. Code, §217). Petitioners each filed a timely motion under section 1033 of the Penal Code for a change of venue on the ground that a fair and impartial trial could not be had in Mendocino County. The trial court found there could be a fair and impartial trial and denied the motions.

In this proceeding petitioners request that we review the trial court’s orders and direct that the venue be changed. The ease at bench is one of first impression in this jurisdiction; this court has not heretofore entertained applications for mandamus relief before trial to compel a change of venue. As will -appear, we conclude that mandate lies to test a nonappealable order denying a change of venue; we further conclude that petitioners’ affidavits and exhibits persuasively demonstrate the need in this case for the mandamus relief requested.

I

While mandate has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.