Pulido

Pulido v. CHRONES

Good Law
567 F.3d 1142·2009 WL 1588671·2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12688
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 200905-15916, 05-16308California112 words

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant’s Petition for Reconsideration of Dispositive Order, filed with this court on March 31, 2009 is GRANTED. The Order remanding the case, filed March 20, 2009 is VACATED.

Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion to file Supplemental Brief Following Supreme Court Remand, filed March 10, 2009 is GRANTED and Petitioner-Appellant’s Supplemental Brief is ordered FILED.

Respondent-Appellant is directed to file a responsive brief to Petitioner-Appellee’s Supplemental Brief to address the application of the harmless error standard of Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 , 113 S.Ct. 1710 , 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993). Respondent-Appellant shall respond within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, and Respondent-Appellant shall provide this court with ten (10) copies.