Marley
Marley v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
Graber, J.
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed December 8, 2008, slip op. at 16067, 548 F.3d 1286 , is replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges Graber and Rawlinson have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wright has so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court called for a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. On such vote, a majority of the nonrecused active judges failed to vote in favor of en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or for rehearing en banc will be entertained.
OPINION
We must decide whether the statute of limitations in § 2401(b) of the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b), is jurisdictional and, in turn, whether courts can employ the doctrines of equitable estoppel or equitable tolling to extend the limitations period. We hold that the statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b) is jurisdictional and, consequently, that equitable doctrines that otherwise could excuse a claimant’s untimely filing do not apply.…