Medina-Villa

United States v. Medina-Villa

Caution
567 F.3d 507·2009 WL 1476981·2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11409
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 200907-50396California6,673 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wardlaw, J.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file the petition for rehearing and/or petition for rehearing en banc is GRANTED. The petition shall be filed no later than July 22, 2009.

Appellee’s request to amend the opinion is GRANTED. The opinion appearing at 567 F.3d 507 (9th Cir. 2009), is amended as follows: On opinion page 512, delete “Contrary to the government’s argument,” and capitalize “nothing.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

OPINION

Cosme Medina-Villa (“Medina”), also known as Cosme Medina-Maella, returns to our court, again convicted of attempted reentry into the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . He was sentenced to a sixty-month term of imprisonment and three years of supervised release, following a sixteen-level increase in his offense level for a prior conviction under California Penal Code section 288(a), which criminalizes lewd and lascivious acts on a child under fourteen. We must decide whether, in light of Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey, 546 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc), a conviction under section 288(a) constitutes “sexual abuse of a minor,” qualifying it as a “crime of violence” that warrants the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.