Nichols

Nichols v. Dancer

Good Law
567 F.3d 423·2009 WL 1362960·29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1·92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,576·2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10931
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 200907-15654California2,389 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether the patronage dismissal doctrine immunizes public employers who terminate employees on the basis of perceived lack of personal loyalty. We conclude that it does not and remand for further proceedings.

I

Kathleen Nichols worked for the Washoe County School District for nine years, her last six as an administrative assistant to the General Counsel for the district, Jeffrey Blanck. Over the course of the six years that Nichols worked for Blanck, they became friends. In her position as assistant to Blanck, Nichols was privy to sensitive information about confidential negotiations as well as information about employees, their backgrounds, and disciplinary measures. By all accounts, the school district had no problems with Nichols or her job performance. In job evaluations, Nichols received only “commendable” and “competent” marks, the two highest marks.

Blanck began having problems with the School District Superintendent James Hager. The District transferred Nichols to a job in Human Resources in January 2004 while it decided whether to terminate Blanck. By that time, Nichols had learned that Blanck had hired legal counsel in case he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.