In Re McKeon

Good Law
1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1289·9 Cal. App. 2d 223·49 P.2d 618
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 1935Crim. 1851California1,541 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tyler, J.

Petitioner was charged with violating ordinance No. 3.0412 of the city and county of San Francisco relating to the payment of an inspection fee in the handling and sale of foodstuffs for human consumption. It appeared at the trial that petitioner was engaged in the retail butcher business in San Francisco; that his premises had been by the board of health, and though demand had been made upon him for payment of the inspection fee of $6, the amount provided for in the ordinance, he had refused to pay the same. The court found him guilty as charged and a fine of $25 or an alternative of five days in the county jail. Petitioner appealed his conviction to the appellate division of the superior court, contending that the ordinance fixing the fee was illegal, unconstitutional, discriminatory and in violation of the federal and state Constitutions, and in direct conflict with the municipal charter. He also contended that the ordinance does not license nor provide for any specific type of inspection and that it is clearly and avowedly a revenue measure. The ordinance in. question, among other things, provides in substance that for the purpose of defraying the cost of regulation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.