Nigg

Nigg v. United States Postal Service

Good Law
555 F.3d 781·2009 WL 251950·14 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 801·2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11110
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 4, 200905-55650California3,874 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

ORDER AND OPINION

ORDER

The petition for panel rehearing is granted in part. The opinion filed August 27, 2007, and appearing at 501 F.3d 1071 , is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. A new opinion is filed contemporaneously.

OPINION

This appeal principally involves the relationship between two labor statutes — the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and a 1996 statute related to compensation for postal inspectors, 39 U.S.C. § 1003 (c). Robert Nigg, a postal inspector currently employed by the United States Postal Service (“the Postal Service”) and Keith Lewis, a retired postal inspector, sued the Postal Service alleging that the inspectors are entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 . The Postal Service does not pay postal inspectors FLSA overtime, instead claiming that their pay is governed by 39 U.S.C. § 1003 (c). At issue is whether the compensation provision in § 1003(c) trumps the overtime provisions of the FLSA.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Postal Service, reasoning that 39 U.S.C. § 1003 (c), which requires…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.