League of Wilderness Defenders-Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service

Good Law
549 F.3d 1211·2008 WL 5171345·39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20296·67 ERC (BNA) 2089·2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24966
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 200806-35780California5,020 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

In their suit filed pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 706 , the League of Wilderness Defenders — -Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project and Cascadia Wildlands Project (collectively, LOWD) sought declaratory and injunctive relief to halt the Deep Creek Vegetation Management Project (the Project), which called for the selective logging of 12.8 million board feet of timber in the Ochoco National Forest. LOWD claims in its suit that the United States Forest Service (Forest Service) failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4231 et seq., and the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), 16 U.S.C. § 1600 et seq., in developing and implementing the Project. The district court denied LOWD’s motion for summary judgment and granted the Forest Service’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Because the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) may not tier to a non-NEPA watershed analysis to consider adequately the aggregate cumulative effects of past timber sales, we reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Forest Service, and we remand this case so the Forest Service can…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.