United States Ex Rel. Torres-Martinez Band of Mission Indians & the Allottees v. Imperial Irrigation District

Good Law
799 F. Supp. 1052·92 Daily Journal DAR 10431·1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10919·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6544
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 1992Civ. 82-1790-K(M)California9,969 words

Opinion

Opinion

Keep, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This matter came before the court for court trial June 9-30, 1992. Plaintiffs are the United States of America and the Torres-Martinez Band of Mission Indians; hereinafter the words “band” or “Torres-Martinez” will refer to both the United States and the Torres-Martinez Band of Mission Indians unless otherwise indicated. They were represented by Peter Monson and Lauren Soil of the U.S. Department of Justice. Defendant Imperial Irrigation District (hereinafter IID) was represented by Paul D. Engstrand and Gerald Smolen, Jr. Defendant Coachella Valley Water District (hereinafter CVWD) was represented by Justin McCarthy and Steven B. Abbott.

Having considered the voluminous body of evidence and the well-prepared arguments of counsel, the court makes the following preliminary observations, findings of fact and conclusions of law.

I. Preliminary Observations

The court wishes to make two preliminary observations. First, the court believes that all counsel in this case deserve formal commendation for their preparation and professionalism. This is a difficult case for a number of reasons and all counsel spent an enormous amount of time mastering…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.