Northwest Environmental Advocates v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
537 F.3d 1006·2008 WL 2813103·2008 A.M.C. 2459·38 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20183·67 ERC (BNA) 1748
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 200803-74795, 06-17187, 06-17188California8,030 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Plaintiffs in this case are Northwest Environmental Advocates, San Francisco Baykeeper, and The Ocean Conservancy. Plaintiffs-intervenors are the States of Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Plaintiffs and plaintiffs-intervenors challenge a regulation originally promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in 1973 exempting certain marine discharges from the permitting scheme of sections 301(a) and' 402 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). That regulation, 40 C.F.R. § 122.3 (a), provides that the following vessel discharges into the navigable waters of the United States do not require permits: discharge of effluent from properly functioning marine engines; discharge of laundry, shower, and galley sink wastes from vessels; and any other discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel, including the discharge of ballast water.

The district court concluded that the EPA had exceeded its authority under the CWA in exempting these discharges from permitting requirements. The district court vacated § 122.3(a), effective September 30, 2008. We affirm the decision of the district court.

I. Background

A. The CWA and 40 C.F.R. § 122.3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.