22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T468,MEMORANDUM Gerardo A. Diaz Javier, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law. Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review. Contrary to Diaz Javier’s contention, the BIA properly determined that he participated in alien smuggling as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6)(E)(i). According to his Record of Sworn Statement, Diaz Javier knew that one passenger in the vehicle he drove lacked legal documentation to enter the United States, yet, when the immigration agent asked him for documentation to enter, he nonetheless presented the agent with that passenger’s fraudulent documentation. Thus, Diaz Javier “provided some form of affirmative assistance to the illegally entering alien.” Altamirano, 427 F.3d at 592 . PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T495,

MEMORANDUM

Gerardo A. Diaz Javier, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law. Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

Contrary to Diaz Javier’s contention, the BIA properly determined that he participated in alien smuggling as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6)(E)(i). According to his Record of Sworn Statement, Diaz Javier knew that one passenger in the vehicle he drove lacked legal documentation to enter the United States, yet, when the immigration agent asked him for documentation to enter, he nonetheless presented the agent with that passenger’s fraudulent documentation. Thus, Diaz Javier “provided some form of affirmative assistance to the illegally entering alien.” Altamirano, 427 F.3d at 592 .

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.