Cooke v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints

Good Law
395 F. App'x 367
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 201009-16960California235 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Roland Cooke appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging religious discrimination claims and due process violations against two private companies who manage the legal affairs of the Mormon Church. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kennedy v. S. Cal. Edison, Co., 268 F.3d 763 , 767 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Cooke’s action because defendants are not state actors and Cooke failed to plead sufficient facts to show that they colluded with state actors in the alleged constitutional violations. See Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830 , 837-38 and n. 6, 102 S.Ct. 2764 , 73 L.Ed.2d 418 (1982) (only state actors or private parties acting in concert with state actors are subject to a section 1983 suit); see also Brentwood Acad. v. Tenn. Secondary Sch. Athletic Ass’n, 531 U.S. 288, 295 , 121 S.Ct. 924 , 148 L.Ed.2d 807 (2001) (private behavior is attributable to the state only if there is a close nexus between the state and the challenged action); Ivey v. Bd. of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir.1982) (“vague and conclusory allegations of official…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.