Beglaryan

Beglaryan v. Holder

Good Law
403 F. App'x 303
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 201006-73315California280 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

We deny Beglaryan’s petition for review.

1. The inconsistency between Beglaryan’s oral testimony and his written declaration with regard to his stated political affiliation undermines his credibility. This discrepancy, which Beglaryan did not adequately explain, goes to the heart of Beglaryan’s claim that he suffered persecution as a result of his work to expose human trafficking with the help of his political party. This unexplained discrepancy supports the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) adverse credibility finding.

2. At his hearing before the IJ, Beglaryan appeared slow to recall a crucial encounter with the Armenian military, undercutting the plausibility of his testimony. Only after his counsel’s repeated questioning did Beglaryan finally recount a dramatic incident involving a TV appearance cut short by military intervention. This hesitation also casts doubt on Beglaryan’s credibility and supports the adverse credibility finding.

3. The IJ’s finding that Beglaryan’s testimony conflicted with the State Department Country Report was not supported by substantial evidence. The Country Report’s short description of a single attempt by the Armenian government to prosecute…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.