United States v. David Wheeler
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
David Wheeler appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment reducing IRS tax assessments to judgment and foreclosing tax liens on the house held by CHT Trust as Wheeler’s nominee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
The IRS introduced sufficient evidence to trigger the legal presumption of correctness afforded to tax assessments. See United States v. Fior D’Italia, Inc., 536 U.S. 238, 242 , 122 S.Ct. 2117 , 153 L.Ed.2d 280 (2002). Wheeler never introduced evidence that clearly demonstrated the proper amount of taxes he owes, and failed to overcome this presumption. See United States v. Pierce, 609 F.2d 407, 408 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam). The district court thus correctly granted summary judgment to the government in reducing the IRS tax assessments to judgment.
Wheeler also challenges the authority of various IRS agents to make the assessments against Wheeler and the authority of other IRS agents to authorize the Department of Justice to file this suit. We have described similar claims as “frivolous.” Palmer v. IRS, 116 F.3d 1309 , 1311, 1314 (9th Cir.1997). The district court correctly rejected them.