United States v. David Casas-Herrera

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 201010-50107California241 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50107

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:06-cr-00810-WQH

v.

MEMORANDUM *

DAVID CASAS-HERRERA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2010 **

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

David Casas-Herrera appeals from the 10-month sentence imposed

following revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Casas-Herrera contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district

court procedurally erred in failing to adequately address his mitigating arguments

and explain the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.