United States v. Anna Murrieta

Good Law
404 F. App'x 183
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 201009-10465California169 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Anna Veronica Murrieta appeals from the 37-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(C). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Murrieta contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider her individual circumstances and arguments for a lower sentence. The record indicates that the district court considered Murrieta’s arguments in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) sentencing factors and did not otherwise procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Murrieta also contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), her sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range is reasonable. See Carty, 520 F.3d at 993-94 .

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.