Allenby

Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. Allenby

Good Law
744 F. Supp. 934·1990 WL 132586·21 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20488·32 ERC (BNA) 1338·1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12163
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 1990C 90-0211 FMS, C 89-0332 FMSCalifornia1,793 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Association (CSMA) is a trade association whose members manufacture a variety of chemical specialty products. Plaintiff filed an action for declaratory judgment in the Southern District, seeking a ruling that California’s Proposition 65 (Prop 65) warning requirements are preempted by two federal statutes, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Roden-ticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq., and the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA), 15 U.S.C. § 1261 et seq. The action was transferred from the Southern to the Eastern District and eventually transferred here soon after this Court granted partial summary judgment for defendant in the related case, D-Con v. Allenby, C 89 0332.

Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment on both the FIFRA and FHSA preemption issues. Plaintiff fails to adequately address this Court’s decision in D-Con v. Allenby, 728 F.Supp. 605 (N.D.Cal.1989), wherein this Court found that, while FIFRA preempts state pesticide labeling requirements (which defendant conceded), it expressly permits state regulation of pesticide sale…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.