Locke

Humane Society of the United States v. Locke

Good Law
626 F.3d 1040·2010 WL 4723195·41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20025·71 ERC (BNA) 2025·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24047
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 23, 201008-36038California9,177 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

In March 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) authorized the states of Oregon, Washington and Idaho to kill up to 85 California sea lions annually at Bonneville Dam. NMFS made the decision under section 120 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), which allows “the intentional lethal taking of individually identifiable pinnipeds which are having a significant negative impact on the decline or recovery of salmonid fishery stocks” that have been listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). 16 U.S.C. § 1389 (b)(1). We must decide whether the agency’s action was “arbitrary” or “capricious” within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), as well as whether the agency violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by failing to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Background

I. Factual Background

Like seals and walruses, California sea lions are pinnipeds — marine mammals having fin-like flippers for locomotion. The Bonneville Dam is on the Columbia River, which serves as a migration path for a number of ESA-listed salmonid populations, including five salmon and steelhead populations at issue here: the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.