Chua Han Mow v. United States

Caution
619 F. Supp. 1332·1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14883
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 1985C-85-2399-WWSCalifornia4,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schwarzer, J.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

Petitioner, Chua Han Mow, moves to correct his federal sentence to reflect time he served in Malaysian custody allegedly “in connection with” the same acts upon which his federal sentence is based. Petitioner was held in Malaysian custody for two different periods: August 4, 1975 to December 20, 1977; and December 21, 1977 to November 28, 1979. The Attorney General determined that the second period of incarceration was for the same offense as the federal conviction and awarded credit for time served during that period, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3568 . At issue in this motion is the first period of custody. Because petitioner has failed to demonstrate his first period of Malaysian detention was in connection with the same acts upon which his current federal sentence is based, his motion will be denied.

I. The Standard of Review for Sentence Correction by the District Court

This court has jurisdiction to correct a federal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , which states in pertinent part:

Petitioner has moved to correct his federal sentence under section 2255, attacking the lawfulness of his prison term based on the statutory entitlement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.