Shames

Shames v. CALIFORNIA TRAVEL AND TOURISM COM'N

Good Law
626 F.3d 1079·2010 WL 4751578·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24333
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 201008-56750California2,769 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robert C. Fellmeth (argued), Center for Public Interest Law, University of San Diego School of Law, San Diego, CA, and Donald G. Rez (briefed), Sullivan, Hill, Lewin, Rez & Engel, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

W. Scott Cameron (argued) and Charles L. Post (briefed), Weintraub Genshlea Chediak, Sacramento, CA, and Diane Shaw (briefed), Office of the Attorney General of the State of California, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee.

Before: MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and M. MARGARET McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

The Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc of Plaintiffs-Appellants is granted for the purpose of withdrawing the Opinion filed on June 8, 2010 and published at 607 F.3d 611 (9th Cir.2010), and substituting a superseding Opinion, filed concurrently herewith.

The parties may file new petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc as to the new Opinion in accordance with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Michael Shames and Gary Gramkow ("Plaintiffs") appeal the dismissal of their claims against the California Travel and Tourism Commission ("CTTC") alleging the CTTC engaged in antitrust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.