Tobing

Tobing v. Holder

Good Law
405 F. App'x 107
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 201008-70039California340 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Barita Lumban Tobing, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision (“IJ”) denying his application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings and review de novo legal determinations. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

The IJ denied Tobing’s asylum claim as time-barred. Tobing does not challenge this dispositive finding in his opening brief.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Tobing’s claim for CAT relief because he failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to Indonesia. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1068 .

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s finding that the incidents Tobing suffered in school and the problems he had with his business partner did not rise to the level of persecution. See id. at 1059-60 . In addition, the record does not compel the conclusion that Tobing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.