Fredy Espinoza v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 201008-73101California275 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDY ANTONIO ESPINOZA, No. 08-73101

Petitioner, Agency No. A094-316-781

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2010 **

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Fredy Antonio Espinoza, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, see Mohammed v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny in part and dismiss

in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.