A. Dariano & Son, Inc. v. District Council of Painters No. 33

Good Law
681 F. Supp. 649·1987 WL 45108·126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2872·1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13241
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1987C-86-20895-SWCalifornia1,390 words

Opinion

Opinion

Williams, J.

ORDER

The cross-motions of plaintiff A. Dariano & Son, Inc., and defendant District Council of Painters No. 33, for summary judgment in the above-entitled matter came on regularly for hearing on July 22, 1987, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom No. 3, of the San Jose Branch of the above-entitled Court. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on its complaint for an order vacating a labor arbitration award and for attorney’s fees, costs, and sanctions. Defendant moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on its counter-claim seeking confirmation of the labor arbitration award, for injunctive relief requiring that A. Dariano & Son, Inc., comply with the labor arbitration award of September 23, 1986, as supplemented by the award of November 12, 1986, for the monetary relief awarded to District Council of Painters No. 33 for the damages caused by A. Dariano & Son, Inc.’s breach of contract, including prejudgment and post-judgment interest on such amounts, and for costs and attorney’s fees incurred by District Council of Paint ers No. 33 to enforce this arbitration award, as provided by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.