Pilkington

Pilkington v. Fausone

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 3d 349·1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1738·90 Cal. Rptr. 38
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1970Civ. 1168California1,229 words

Opinion

Opinion

Coakley, J.

This quiet title action presents the question of ownership of an alley, 20 feet wide. The court decreed ownership of the westerly 10 feet of the alley in the respondents and the easterly 10 feet in appellant. Appellant contends he owns the entire 20 feet.

The facts are not in dispute and there is no issue of credibility of witnesses. The solution lies in the interpretation of documentary evidence, chiefly deeds, and in applicable statutes. Accordingly, the question is one of law, which, as an appellate court, we must resolve independently of the trial court’s determination. (Parsons v. Bristol Development Co., 62 Cal.2d 861, 865 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 767 , 402 P.2d 839 ].)

The alley was dedicated to public use in 1906 when the Fresno County Board of Supervisors accepted a subdivision map, and the same was recorded, showing the alley as a public way. Fee title was not conveyed to the county. It, therefore, acquired only an easement for public use. The easement was officially abandoned in 1966. When a public easement in a street or alley is officially abandoned, title reverts to the owner or owners of the underlying fee. (Sts. & Hwy. Code, § § 960, 960.5.)

The alley which runs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.