McDonald

McDonald v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

Good Law
370 F. Supp. 625·1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12293
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 1974CV 74-87-LTLCalifornia5,510 words

Opinion

Opinion

Real, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs Glenn S. McDonald and Roscoe Pondexter are basketball players who have during the 1973-74 academic year been competing in basketball on behalf of defendant California State University Long Beach (hereafter Long Beach.)

On January 8, 1974 McDonald and Pondexter were notified by Frank Bowman, University Athletic Representative at Long Beach, as follows:

This declaration of ineligibility of McDonald and Pondexter on behalf of Long Beach arises out of its membership in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (hereafter NCAA) and further out of a decision of that association imposing sanctions on Long Beach for the violation of its rules, which sanctions include, but are not limited to, Long Beach’s declaration of ineligibility of McDonald and Pondexter.

McDonald and Pondexter have filed their Complaint For Injunction and Declaratory Relief alleging: (1) the unconstitutionality of NCAA Bylaw 4-6-B-l, commonly known as the 1.600 Rule, and (2) the violation of due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, in light of the NCAA’s failure to afford them notice and hearing on the claimed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.