Busing

Busing v. Pierson

Good Law
1 Cal. 2d 493·1934 Cal. LEXIS 402·36 P.2d 118
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 1934L. A. 14766California262 words

Opinion

Opinion

Respondent moves. to dismiss an appeal from an order denying motion to retax costs on the ground that the transcript was not filed within the time required by law. When the motion to dismiss came on for hearing the transcript had been filed and appellant, by way of affidavit, averred that her delay in completing and filing the transcript was due principally to an attempt to consummate a settlement of the cause and thus obviate the necessity of preparing and filing the documents essential to the appeal. A counter affidavit filed by respondent denies material portions of appellant’s showing. In a supplemental affidavit appellant avers that the certificate of the clerk attached to the copy of the notice of motion served on her had to do with an appeal prosecuted by other parties to the litigation. In view of these matters appellant requests that she be relieved of her default and given reasonable time within which to file her opening brief.

When the motion came on to be heard the transcript had been on file for approximately one month. The delay in its filing has not retarded the determination of the appeal. On the showing made we are, therefore, inclined to relieve appellant of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.