Johnston

Johnston v. Landucci

Good Law
1942 Cal. LEXIS 426·21 Cal. 2d 63·130 P.2d 405·148 A.L.R. 1355
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 29, 1942L. A. 17749California2,864 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peters, J.

— Plaintiffs and cross-defendants E. E. Johnston and Viola Johnston, husband and wife, appeal from a judgment quieting their title to certain lands in Fresno County, subject to a lien of defendant and cross-complainant Olive Landucci, which lien is ordered foreclosed by the judgment. The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the lien ordered foreclosed is based upon a valid contract, it being the contention of the appellants that such contract was totally unsupported by consideration. The trial court found, and its judgment is predicated on such finding, that the contract was supported by consideration.

The facts giving rise to the controversy are as follows: In 1928 appellant E. E. Johnston, and his adult son, defendant Arthur F. Johnston, purchased on an installment contract from Miller & Lux certain farming land in Fresno County for a total purchase price of $9,230.70. Prior to November of 1931 the two Johnstons took possession of the land, farmed it, and expended substantial sums in improvements. In July of 1931 the two Johnstons, by written agreement, and subject to the Miller & Lux contract, partitioned the property, Arthur taking the east half and his father…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.