Campbell

Campbell v. Allstate Insurance

Good Law
1963 Cal. LEXIS 239·32 Cal. Rptr. 827·60 Cal. 2d 303·384 P.2d 155
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 15, 1963S. F. 21322California1,483 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gibson, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to compel defendant insurer to pay a default judgment they had obtained against its insured, Marvin Hammer. The court, sitting without a jury, denied recovery, and plaintiffs have appealed.

In November 1954 plaintiffs stopped their automobile at a stoplight and were struck from the rear by an automobile driven by Hammer. The police report of the accident states that Hammer was cited for following too closely and for driving with an expired license, that he admitted he had been drinking, and that he refused to give a written statement. He told plaintiffs that he was insured and that “everything would be taken care of.”

On the day of the accident Hammer notified defendant by telegram that he had been involved in a collision and that his car had been towed to a certain garage. The telegram contained Hammer’s address and policy number, and defendant thereafter tried to contact him at his home and business addresses without success. Messages for him were left with his daughter and estranged wife, but he did not reply. Defendant wrote Hammer two letters stating that a serious personal injury had resulted from the accident, that under a cooperation clause…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.