Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
46 Cal. 4th 272·3 Cal. WCC 495
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 11, 2009S150528California2,548 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moreno, J.

In these consolidated workers’ compensation cases, we consider the scope of Labor Code section 4607, which provides: “Where a party to a proceeding institutes proceedings to terminate an award made by the appeals board to an applicant for continuing medical treatment and is unsuccessful in such proceedings, the appeals board may determine the amount of attorney’s fees reasonably incurred by the applicant in resisting the proceeding to terminate the medical treatment, and may assess such reasonable attorney’s fees as a cost upon the party instituting the proceedings to terminate the award of the appeals board.” (Lab. Code, § 4607.)

Petitioners obtained awards for future treatment of their industrial injuries. Sometime thereafter, they submitted medical treatment requests, but their employers’ insurance carrier disputed their entitlement to the requested care. Petitioners initiated proceedings to obtain the treatment and, ultimately, were determined to be entitled to the requested care. The insurer thereafter authorized the treatment requests. Petitioners subsequently sought attorney fees pursuant to section 4607. Based on the statutory language, the Workers’ Compensation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.