In Re Bolden

Good Law
2009 Cal. LEXIS 4291·46 Cal. 4th 216·92 Cal. Rptr. 3d 850·206 P.3d 393
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 4, 2009S099231California5,236 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kennard, J.

A jury convicted petitioner Clifford Stanley Bolden of the first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187) and robbery (§ 211) of Henry Michael Pedersen. The jury found that petitioner used a deadly weapon for both offenses (§ 12022, subd. (b)), and, as a special circumstance, that petitioner murdered Pedersen while engaged in the commission of the robbery (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(A)). The jury fixed the penalty for the murder at death. The trial court denied the automatic motion to modify penalty (§ 190.4, subd. (e)) and sentenced petitioner to death. On petitioner’s automatic appeal, this court affirmed the judgment. (People v. Bolden (2002) 29 Cal.4th 515 [ 127 Cal.Rptr.2d 802 , 58 P.3d 931 ].)

In a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, petitioner now seeks relief from the judgment. He has alleged, among other things, that the attorney appointed to represent him during the capital trial provided ineffective assistance by not specifically asking prospective jurors during voir dire about their prior acquaintance with victim Pedersen, and also that one of the trial jurors, Jose S., displayed bias and committed misconduct by not disclosing a prior relationship with Pedersen, by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.