North Bay Regional Center v. Maldonado

Bad Law
117 Cal. Rptr. 3d 342·50 Cal. 4th 1206·241 P.3d 840
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 8, 2010S175855California8,308 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moreno, J.

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, a litigant who acts as a private attorney general and is a successful party in the litigation may under certain circumstances recover attorney fees from the opposing parties. One of the requirements that courts are directed to consider when determining eligibility for attorney fees is “the necessity and financial burden of private enforcement.” As explained below, courts have long construed this language to mean, among other things, that a litigant who has a financial interest in the .litigation may be disqualified from obtaining such fees when expected or realized financial gains offset litigation costs. What is less clear is whether nonfinancial, nonpecuniary personal interests in the litigation, such as vindicating the best interests of a child or sibling, can also serve to render a litigant ineligible for attorney fees, as some Courts of Appeal have held. That issue is squarely presented by this case.

We conclude that a litigant’s personal nonpecuniary motives may not be used to disqualify that litigant from obtaining fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. The contrary interpretation, which was adopted by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.