Felt

Felt v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Good Law
831 F. Supp. 780·1993 WL 409549·144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2071·62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1057·63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,676
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 1993CV 92-4217 LGBCalifornia2,342 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baird, J.

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment.

After considering the papers filed by the parties and all other relevant materials in the record, the Court hereby issues the following Order:

I. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

A. The Railway Labor Act

A short synopsis of the factual background of this matter provides a useful context for consideration of the pending motion.

Plaintiff James Felt filed suit against Defendant, his former employer, in July, 1992, alleging religious discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated the provisions of the Act by not respecting Plaintiffs religious beliefs; as a Seventh Day Adventist, Plaintiff may not work on Saturdays.

Plaintiff was a clerical employee of Defendant from 1971 until 1983, when he was laid off as part of a reduction in force. Still, under the terms of the relevant agreement between Defendant and Plaintiffs union (the “BRAC”—the Brotherhood of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.