Baca

United States v. Baca

Good Law
368 F. Supp. 398·1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10777
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 197314656, 14964, 15803, 15850, 15813, 15991, 14344, 15410, 16245, 15666, 15463, 15847, 15046, 15650, 16360, 15606, 15651California10,355 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turrentine, J.

On June 21, 1973, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 , 93 S.Ct. 2535 , 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973) that a “roving search” of an automobile, without a warrant and without probable cause, when not a border search, or the functional equivalent thereof, violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Thereafter, the Ninth Circuit remanded cases to this and other districts for “consideration of the impact of Almeida-Sanchez. . . . ” E. g. United States v. Cuellar Baca, Slip No. 73-2048 (Sept. 10, 1973). Presently there are well in excess of 20 cases pending in this District either on remand from the Circuit or upon original heai> ing raising constitutional questions left open by Almeida-Sanchez .

On October 21, 1973, the judges of the United States Federal District Court for the Southern District of California in General Order 176 ordered that a comprehensive factual hearing be held to evaluate the consequences, if any, of Al meida-Sanchez on the checkpoints operated by the Border Patrol within this District. All cases in this District raising this issue were consolidated on a voluntary basis.

Subsequently, on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.