Tijani

Tijani v. Holder

Good Law
628 F.3d 1071·2010 WL 4925449
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 201005-70195California9,563 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOONAN, J.

Cecillia D. Wang, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner.

Ada E. Bosque, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

Before: JOHN T. NOONAN, A. WALLACE TASHIMA, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TASHIMA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.

The Opinion filed March 11, 2010 is withdrawn. A new Opinion is filed herewith.

With the new Opinion, the government's petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. Judge Callahan would grant the government's petition for rehearing.

The panel votes to deny Tijani's petition for panel rehearing. Judge Callahan votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Noonan so recommends. Judge Tashima recommends granting the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Tijani's petition for rehearing is DENIED and his petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

No further petitions for rehearing and for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Monsuru Olasumbo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.