United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Good Law
471 F. Supp. 532·200 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 514·1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14802
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 1978C-70-852 SAWCalifornia7,408 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weigel, J.

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In this case the United States of America seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse), Mitsubishi Electric Corporation (Melco), and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI), for alleged violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act between an unspecified date in 1965 and April 22, 1970, the date of filing. Section 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 4 (1976) establishes jurisdiction.

The relationship between Westinghouse and the Mitsubishi defendants and their predecessors extends back more than fifty years. Prior to World War II they were parties to a contract whereby Westinghouse supplied technical and manufacturing information in exchange for royalties on the sale of resulting products. The predecessors of the Mitsubishi defendants were permitted to sell the products only in Japan and China. The contract was interrupted by World War II. After the War, the United States sought ways to help Japan to redevelop her economy. Westinghouse and other corporations were urged to share their technological advances with Japanese industry. As a part of this effort, Westinghouse entered into the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.