Carlis Gragg v. K. Prosper
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 201009-17268California654 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 09 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLIS A. GRAGG, No. 09-17268
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02162-GGH
v.
MEMORANDUM *
K. PROSPER,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Gregory G. Hollows, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 7, 2010 ** San Francisco, California
Before: D.W. NELSON, THOMPSON, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Carlis A. Gragg appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for
habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Gragg was found guilty of making a criminal threat in violation of California