Serrano

Serrano v. Holder

Good Law
405 F. App'x 237
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 201008-70231California429 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Brenda Patricia Serrano, a native and citizen of Guatemala, and Serafín Serrano petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Sowe v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1281, 1285 (9th Cir.2008), and we review de novo due process claims, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that the treatment inflicted on Serrano by her aunt does not rise to the level of past persecution. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003) (petitioner’s experiences did not “evince actions so severe to compel a finding of past persecution”). The record does not compel the conclusion that the threats Serrano’s father received in the 1980s were connected to her. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1060 (9th Cir.2009) (petitioner must demonstrate harms to family were part of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.