David Nolette v. Don Helling
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 201009-15480California435 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 13 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALTER HOWARD WHITE, No. 09-15840
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:07-cv-00749-WQH-
WMC
v.
DERRAL G. ADAMS, MEMORANDUM *
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding
** Submitted December 6, 2010
Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Walter Howard White appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). White contends that the prison disciplinary officer deprived him of his due
process right to call witnesses at…