Pena

Pena v. Downey Savings & Loan, Ass'n

Good Law
929 F. Supp. 1308·96 Daily Journal DAR 13461·1996 WL 361129·1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8969
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 25, 1996CV 96-2051 WJR (AJWx)California4,612 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rea, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

I.

INTRODUCTION

Defendants have brought a motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The matter came on regularly for a hearing before the Court on April 22, 1996. Having considered the motion, the papers filed in support thereof and in opposition thereto, the oral argument of counsel, and the file in the case, the Court now issues the following decision.

II.

BACKGROUND

Neither side has submitted a statement of facts in its brief, and the complaint is woefully short of many relevant details. As far as the Court can ascertain, the instant dispute arises out of the circumstances of plaintiff Alicia Pena’s (“Pena”) employment and termination at defendant Downey Savings and Loan Association’s (“Downey”) West Lancaster facility in Lancaster, California. Pena was hired by Downey as a customer service representative on May 20, 1993. After approximately two years of employment, Pena was terminated, purportedly for a violation of Downey’s policies preventing employees from accepting personal loans from customers. Pena contends that, during discussions with her former branch manager, Chris Alvarez, she adequately refuted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.