In Re Castro

Joseph v. Hewitt (In Re Castro)

Good Law
1993 WL 337538·158 B.R. 180·1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1253
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 23, 1993Bankruptcy No. SA 91-32100 JR, Adv. No. SA 92-1935 JRCalifornia1,934 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ryan, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

INTRODUCTION

James Joseph, Chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”), brought this proceeding against John Hewitt, an individual, and Hewitt Industries of Los Angeles, Inc. (collectively “Hewitt”) to quiet title to real property located in Montevideo, Uruguay (the “Property”). After hearing cross-motions for summary judgment, I granted judgment for Hewitt. I found that Hewitt had paid the entire purchase price, all maintenance costs, and taxes on the Property and was the equitable owner of the Property. Further, I found that such ownership was not defeated by Trustee’s avoidance powers under § 544(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) since Trustee had constructive notice of the equitable claim from Debtors’ schedules. On Trustee’s motion for reconsideration, I took under submission the question of whether Trustee had constructive notice of an equitable claim based upon information contained in late filed schedules.

JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 (a) (the district courts shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all cases under Title 11), 28 U.S.C. § 157 (a) (authorizing the district courts to refer all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.