In Re Rueter

Rueter v. Robertson (In Re Rueter)

Good Law
1993 WL 344357·158 B.R. 163·24 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1087·1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12216
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 1993C-93-0297 MHPCalifornia3,095 words

Opinion

Opinion

Patel, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This is an appeal by James Rueter and Eva Rueter (“Debtors”) from an August 13, 1992 order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, Judge Marilyn Morgan presid ing, (“Bankruptcy Court”) granting a motion regarding certain tax attributes brought by James E. Robertson, trustee in bankruptcy of debtors’ estate (“Trustee”) under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. This court has jurisdiction to hear Debtors’ appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (a). Having reviewed the arguments and submissions of the parties, and for the reasons explained below, the court REVERSES the order of the Bankruptcy Court.

BACKGROUND

On December 5, 1990, the Debtors filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. The case was subsequently converted into a Chapter 7 action and Jerome E. Robertson was appointed Trustee.

A dispute then arose between the Debtors and the Trustee regarding whether the Debtors or, instead, their Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate (“Estate”) was entitled to use for federal income tax purposes a certain feature of the Debtors’ federal income tax situation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.