Gardner

Gardner v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.

Good Law
691 F. Supp. 2d 1192·2010 WL 582117·71 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 580·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12068
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20102:09-cv-00744California4,568 words

Opinion

Opinion

Burrell, J.

ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

On October 2, 2009, Defendants American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (“AHMSI”) and AHMSI Default Services, Inc. (“AHMSI Default”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) in which they seek an order dismissing the seven claims alleged against them in Plaintiffs first amended complaint. (Docket No. 42.) For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED and DENIED IN PART.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

A Rule 12(b)(6) motion “challenges a complaint’s compliance with ... pleading requirements.” Champlaie v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, No. S- 09-1316 LKK/DAD, 2009 WL 3429622, at *1 (E.D.Cal. Oct. 22, 2009). A pleading must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief....” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). The complaint must “give the defendant fair notice of what the [plaintiffs] claim is and the grounds upon which relief rests .... ” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007). Further, “[a] pleading that offers labels and conclusions or a formulaic recitation of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.