Jarrett
Jarrett v. North American Rockwell Corp.
Opinion
Opinion
Hauk, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The above-entitled matter having come on to be heard on Defendant ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION’S (hereafter “ROCKWELL”) Motion to Dismiss plaintiff’s cause of action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, on May 2,1977, before the Honorable A. Andrew Hauk, United States District Judge, David J. Shapiro appearing as counsel for Defendant ROCKWELL, and Wyatt and Reese by James A. Wyatt, Jr., appearing as counsel for Plaintiff JIMMIE G. JARRETT; the Court having considered all the documents filed with respect to said Motion, the pleadings, memoranda, and having heard and considered the arguments of counsel; and the Court being fully advised in the premises, now makes the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff is a Negro, female employee of ROCKWELL.
2. On September 27, 1971, plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereafter “EEOC”), alleging discrimination on the basis of her race, Negro.
3. The EEOC, in its letters of “Determination” and “No Cause Dismissal/Notice of Right to Sue Within 90…