Bucio-Carrillo
Bucio-Carrillo v. Holder
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ramon Bucio-Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review.
1. Bucio-Carrillo seeks to collaterally attack his 1998 removal order. As a general rule, “an alien cannot collaterally attack an earlier exclusion or deportation at a subsequent deportation hearing, in the absence of a gross miscarriage of justice at the prior proceedings.” Ramirez-Juarez v. INS, 633 F.2d 174, 175-76 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam). Here, the BIA did not err in concluding that Bucio-Carrillo failed to demonstrate a “gross miscarriage of justice at the prior proceeding,” because the May 1, 1998 deportation order was lawful when he was deported on July 14, 1998. See Alvarenga-Villalobos v. Ashcroft, 271 F.3d 1169, 1172-73 (9th Cir.2001). Therefore, Bucio-Carrillo cannot collaterally attack his 1998 removal order.
Additionally, Bucio-Carrillo is not entitled to the relief provided by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.44 , because it specifically excludes aliens who illegally return to the United States.